<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>2nd server need a CAL in SBS environment - not with R2</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/09/19/2nd-server-need-a-CAL-in-SBS-environment-_2D00_-not-with-R2.aspx</link><description>This discussion came up yesterday internally and I thought I would share this as it has been discussed before In the Licensing FAQ: http://www.microsoft.com/WindowsServer2003/sbs/evaluation/faq/licensing.mspx it states: Q. Do additional servers in my</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: 2nd server need a CAL in SBS environment - not with R2</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/09/19/2nd-server-need-a-CAL-in-SBS-environment-_2D00_-not-with-R2.aspx#2113</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:06:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:2113</guid><dc:creator>David Overton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Need to also say this is true with SBS 2003 SP1 as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ttfn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2113" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>