<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>I love the press - saying that organisations are "banning" Vista when they are doing normal testing - and then writing another story when they get it wrong!!</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/03/22/i-love-the-press-saying-that-organisations-are-banning-vista-when-they-are-doing-normal-testing-and-then-writing-another-story-when-they-get-it-wrong.aspx</link><description>I read with interest the previosu stories about large oganisations banning Vista deployments, wondering if this was anything but normal policy. Then this story broke where NIST in the US "were irked" at suggestions that the ban was in anyway but normal</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator></channel></rss>