"Vista, XP Users Equally At Peril To Viruses, Exploits" and then a lengthy retort from Roger A Grimes including the comment that the number of vulnerabilities over a given time for OSs were XP-28, Vista-11, Max OSX-101

"Vista, XP Users Equally At Peril To Viruses, Exploits" and then a lengthy retort from Roger A Grimes including the comment that the number of vulnerabilities over a given time for OSs were XP-28, Vista-11, Max OSX-101http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/06/10/vista-xp-users-equally-at-peril-to-viruses-exploits-and-then-a-lengthy-retort-from-roger-a-grimes.aspxI have been RSS feed and news hunting and found this review in IT Channel News stating that Vista was no more secure than Windows XP. Then I read how things seemless slipped onto the system and I started to get frustrated that they must have turned offenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://vista.security-feed.com/2007/06/10/vista-xp-users-equally-at-peril-to-viruses-exploits-and-then-a/http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/06/10/vista-xp-users-equally-at-peril-to-viruses-exploits-and-then-a-lengthy-retort-from-roger-a-grimes.aspx#4390Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:46:19 GMT72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:4390TrackBack<img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4390" width="1" height="1">