<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>VoIP and Unified Communications may be the future, but it has plenty of pitfalls for networks, phone systems and vendors alike</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/09/11/voip-and-unified-communications-may-be-the-future-but-it-has-plenty-of-pitfalls-for-networks-phone-systems-and-vendors-alike.aspx</link><description>In many ways I am a traditionalist. I wasn&amp;#39;t the 1st to embrace the UC/VoIP and I have to admit that my personal commercial foray into this has so far left me turning off this technology as the sound quality was not there. Apparently my 20mb/768kb</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: VoIP and Unified Communications may be the future, but it has plenty of pitfalls for networks, phone systems and vendors alike</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/09/11/voip-and-unified-communications-may-be-the-future-but-it-has-plenty-of-pitfalls-for-networks-phone-systems-and-vendors-alike.aspx#4741</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:21:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:4741</guid><dc:creator>Vijay Singh Riyait</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the change in telecomms infrastructure in the UK with BT&amp;#39;s 21CN Project, then I think this will change (at least for national communications going over BT&amp;#39;s core network).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>