<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows is now getting too difficult to hack, so the hackers sights are moving elsewhere, but that does not mean security is now easier.</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/10/17/windows-is-now-getting-too-difficult-to-hack-so-the-hackers-sights-are-moving-elsewhere-but-that-does-not-mean-security-is-now-easier.aspx</link><description>I have heard many times how Windows is the big target for virus and phishing nasty people in general, but more and more people are showing that Windows is just too hard to hack when applications and other platforms offer so much more opportunity. From</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Is Linux Really More Secure, or is it Just Less Obvious When Compromised?</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/10/17/windows-is-now-getting-too-difficult-to-hack-so-the-hackers-sights-are-moving-elsewhere-but-that-does-not-mean-security-is-now-easier.aspx#5050</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:22:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:5050</guid><dc:creator>Tim Long</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading an article by David Overton , a Microsoft employee whose opinions I really respect. Of&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5050" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>