More on Vista vs XP performance - why doesn't everyone want a racing car, but instead do they opt for safety, comfort or even the ability to have more than one passenger?

re: More on Vista vs XP performance - why doesn't everyone want a racing car, but instead do they opt for safety, comfort or even the ability to have more than one passenger?

Jim Watkin — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:57:23 GMT

Nice article. I have vista installed and keep reading i'm losing out by not having xp on my machine. I agree it's probably faster but the features are not as good.

For instance; do i really need another firewall when vista has a pretty good one already? (possibly)

Do i need/like the search facility? Yes !!!

Do I like the front end graphics and transparency? Probably. And, so on !!!

I've made my choice, i'm staying with vista........its pointless going backwards imho !!!

More on the differences between real world Vista performance and that of a benchmark

David Overton's Blog — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:41:33 GMT

Following up on my articles that discuss Vista performance (I still stick by my statement that it is

More on Vista vs XP performance - why doesn’t everyone want a racing car, but instead do they opt for safety, comfort or even the ability to have more than one passenger? | time management

Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:22:30 GMT

Pingback from More on Vista vs XP performance - why doesn’t everyone want a racing car, but instead do they opt for safety, comfort or even the ability to have more than one passenger? | time management