<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx</link><description>I need to take my hat off to the PSS guys in India. I &amp;quot;met&amp;quot; Girish on the Microsoft internal aliases and then delivering a Technet chat. I&amp;#39;ve since seen him post some great blog posts, but also answer key questions in various SBS forums</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx#8864</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:41:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:8864</guid><dc:creator>David Overton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;SBS 2003 &amp;amp; SBS 2008 do not come with a &amp;quot;host&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;guest&amp;quot; license simply because the product can not be installed the &amp;quot;core&amp;quot; manner that SBS 2008 can deliver this solution. &amp;nbsp;They do run in virtual enviroments however.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, if you are using SBS 2003 as a host you will need to license all guests and if you are running SBS 2008 as a host you can run Windows Sevrer 2003/8 as a licensed guest with the premium edition which gives you a 2nd server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8864" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx#8849</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:8849</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good question, what licensing is required for the guest OS if running Virtual Server 2005 on SBS 2003 R2?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8849" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx#6597</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:6597</guid><dc:creator>Lionel Camara</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you run the &amp;quot;server&amp;quot; part of SBS as a guest OS? (Assuming you get 1 VM license in addition to the host, the way you get with Server Standard.) Any experience w/ it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6597" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx#5484</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:46:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:5484</guid><dc:creator>David Overton</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Vijay,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would always be cautious about running a customers business on a beta that has no form of support. &amp;nbsp;If it was part of a RDP / TAP program, or had some form of go-live license and support I would, but without support, nope, I would not do it with a customers live systems. &amp;nbsp;For my own business I might, but I know the risks and can manage them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5484" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SBS 2003, Virtual Server and / or Terminal Services and why use virtualisation and the risks to consider</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2007/12/17/sbs-2003-virtual-server-and-or-terminal-services-and-why-use-virtualisation-and-the-risks-to-consider.aspx#5483</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:58:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:5483</guid><dc:creator>Vijay Singh Riyait</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you think of using the newly available Beta Hyper-V version of Server 2008 as a base system for SBS 2003? I know the traditional advice is don&amp;#39;t deploy it on production servers but if Microsoft are willing to trust some their key services to it, then can we?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5483" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>