<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Dear Susan … It is 75 CALs, but recommended for 50 users … reply to "Tom"? We'll need you to dispel another myth. - The Official Blog of the SBS "Diva"</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/03/26/dear-susan-it-is-75-cals-but-recommended-for-50-users-reply-to-quot-tom-quot-we-ll-need-you-to-dispel-another-myth-the-official-blog-of-the-sbs-quot-diva-quot.aspx</link><description>Susan has raised a really good point and something that is often misunderstood about SBS – and this ties in to SBS 2003 AND SBS 2008. What is the problem … Here is what Susan put… is SBS designed for 50 or 75 CALs? &amp;quot;Tom&amp;quot;? We&amp;#39;ll need you</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator></channel></rss>