<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Silverlight Adoption Expected to Triple .. especially when you look at what is in V2</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/04/15/silverlight-adoption-expected-to-triple-especially-when-you-look-at-what-is-in-v2.aspx</link><description>Forward looking statements are always risky, but I do see Silverlight popping up all over the place. Even the next rev of the theme for this website will be based on Silverlight. in a recent article Evans Data claimed that Silverlight Adoption Expected</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Silverlight Adoption Expected to Triple .. especially when you look at what is in V2</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/04/15/silverlight-adoption-expected-to-triple-especially-when-you-look-at-what-is-in-v2.aspx#7306</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:56:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:7306</guid><dc:creator>software development</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well its about time. Silverlight is far superior platform compared to other RIA platforms such as FLASH. I think native printing is a required but not yet available addition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7306" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>