<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Microsoft Partners should embrace S+S and still deliver on premise solutions</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx</link><description>I was at the Microsoft World Wide Partner Conference when Microsoft announced their S+S (Software plus Services) and some partners decided to throw their toys out the pram and start a whole bunch of scare mongering around the partner opportunity. I’ve</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Recent URLs tagged Mis - Urlrecorder</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#7335</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:16:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:7335</guid><dc:creator>Recent URLs tagged Mis - Urlrecorder</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;Recent URLs tagged Mis - Urlrecorder&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7335" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why Microsoft Partners should embrace S+S and still deliver on premise solutions - David Overton's Blog</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#7095</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:33:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:7095</guid><dc:creator>UK SBSC</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last night I attended the Thames Valley SBSC User group in which Vijay Riyait, one of the UK&amp;#39;s SBSC PAL&amp;#39;s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7095" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>&amp;raquo; David Overton On Software plus Services</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#6758</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:49:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:6758</guid><dc:creator>» David Overton On Software plus Services</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Pingback from &amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;raquo; David Overton On Software plus Services&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Microsoft Partners should embrace S+S and still deliver on premise solutions</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#6752</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:14:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:6752</guid><dc:creator>Vijay Singh Riyait</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You see the problem Dave is that people in Microsoft are not articulating the scenarios and opportunities as you do! As you&amp;#39;ve seen and we&amp;#39;ve discussed it causes huge problems within the Partner Community. So, how does this get fixed? Do we continue to rely on you or is Microsoft as a whole going to get its act together and start talking in a language that Partners like ourselves can understand and trust?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If S+S is a key strategy by Microsoft then it really needs to up its game on this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One thing I can say that going forward the SBSC Programme will begin to reflect the above scenarios you have outlined so that Partners will have different routes/specialisations within SBSC. This is one of the things the PALs are going to be contributing to in the coming months and asking for input from the Community.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this detailed explanation, it&amp;#39;s great stuff!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6752" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Microsoft Partners should embrace S+S and still deliver on premise solutions</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#6750</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:42:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:6750</guid><dc:creator>David Schrag</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Amen!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Why Microsoft Partners should embrace S+S and still deliver on premise solutions</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2008/07/19/why-microsoft-partners-should-embrace-s-s-and-still-deliver-on-premise-solutions.aspx#6749</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:32:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:6749</guid><dc:creator>Vlad Mazek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If Ballmer or Turner delivered the S+S pitch like this, everyone would be excited and nobody would be pissed. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Job well done Dave!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Vlad&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6749" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>