<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Sorry Tim, but the Exchange beta has been updated</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/27/Sorry-Tim_2C00_-but-the-Exchange-beta-has-been-updated.aspx</link><description>I should not poke fun at Tim - sorry mate. The Exchange 2007 beta 2 has released. It can be found at http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/beta2 and a nice news article about it can be found at http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3622081 . To</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Sorry Tim, but the Exchange beta has been updated</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/27/Sorry-Tim_2C00_-but-the-Exchange-beta-has-been-updated.aspx#885</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:54:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:885</guid><dc:creator>Tim Long</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That's OK, I have a thick skin ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now I do feel slightly hypocritical for complaining about too much beta availability, because in another comment I was also complaining that it was too hard to get access to beta code (or more exactly, as a Microsoft partner, I was only able to get Office 2007 beta at the same time as Joe Public). But things are crazy at the moment. The whole world is going to be running unsupported beta releases of the whole darned stack. As an example of what I mean, try downloading Internet Explorer 6 SP1 and see if you don't end up with IE 7 beta 3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's OK for &amp;quot;insiders&amp;quot; and even for competent hobbyists, but I'm not sure that aggressively marketing all these unsupported betas to Joe Public is really the right thing to do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is nice to see the appearance of betas in the latest Action Pack shipment, though - a very appropriate place for beta software. I think that is a good step, provided it doesn't dilute the &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; Action Pack content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=885" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>