<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://192.168.2.20/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microsoft is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't sort out security in windows Vista</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/29/Microsoft-is-damned-if-ti-does-and-damned-if-it-doesn_2700_t-sort-out-security-in-windows-Vista.aspx</link><description>One again I was scanning the news when this article caught my eye. It discusses the complexity of trying to make a more secure OS for Vista while also trying to enable application compatibility. I once discovered that we had over 10,000 &amp;quot;fixes&amp;quot;</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Microsoft is damned if it does and damned if it doesn't sort out security in windows Vista</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/29/Microsoft-is-damned-if-ti-does-and-damned-if-it-doesn_2700_t-sort-out-security-in-windows-Vista.aspx#4416</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:07:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:4416</guid><dc:creator>ICE-Computer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Having just obtained Windows Vista in the last month, I am not overly impressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I do think the security has greatly improved. &amp;nbsp;The UAC, possibly one of the biggest improvements is also the most annoying. &amp;nbsp;Quite simply, I do not understand their failure to implement on the UAC a feature similar in nature to the firewall that would allow a user to say &amp;#39;Remember this action.&amp;#39; for particular types of actions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4416" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://blogs.technet.com/all_things_appcompat/archive/2006/04/26/426511.aspx</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/29/Microsoft-is-damned-if-ti-does-and-damned-if-it-doesn_2700_t-sort-out-security-in-windows-Vista.aspx#978</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:39:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:978</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=978" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>http://blogs.msdn.com/windowsvistasecurity/archive/2006/07/28/681833.aspx</title><link>http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/29/Microsoft-is-damned-if-ti-does-and-damned-if-it-doesn_2700_t-sort-out-security-in-windows-Vista.aspx#977</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:39:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:977</guid><dc:creator>TrackBack</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=977" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>