http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/28/R2-delayed-by-a-few-bad-files.aspxI knew a day or so that this was coming - R2 was delayed because a few of the core files were &quot;old&quot; versions and should have been updated. As expected this will delay R2 being in the shops and at distributors. As expected Susan B has bloggedenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/28/R2-delayed-by-a-few-bad-files.aspx#918Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:38:59 GMT72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:918David Overton<p>I presume the language is English - can you tell me if it is Standard or Premium you are installing?</p> <p>thanks</p> <p>David</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=918" width="1" height="1">http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/28/R2-delayed-by-a-few-bad-files.aspx#917Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:45:42 GMT72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:917David Overton<p>We have not released an updated version, so yet you have the &quot;bad&quot; version. &nbsp;While I am running this myself and don't have any problems, there are obviously issues that need to be addressed.</p> <p>I will ask to get guidance, but I suspect it might be &quot;don't install it&quot;.</p> <p>ttfn</p> <p>David</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=917" width="1" height="1">http://192.168.2.20/blogs/doverton/archive/2006/07/28/R2-delayed-by-a-few-bad-files.aspx#916Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:11:46 GMT72050d9c-4f41-4a16-9f70-ebbf2c98a2c7:916IrshadI already have an OEM version of R2 - planning to install on Monday. Is there a way to tell if I've got the bad version? Thanks<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://192.168.2.20/aggbug.aspx?PostID=916" width="1" height="1">