-
Hi Terry, You don't need to manually migrate offline folders. From each workstation (on the remote side), just right click over the appropriate folders and choose offline folders. This creates the offline folder on the workstation. You don't need to offline the whole Share, it depends what data they access regularly. Also, only differences in
-
Hi Terry, Perhaps the easiest option for the remote office users would to have offline folders, so that if the VPN connection isn't available then data is available on each workstation. When back online, these will sync back to the server. There is Microsoft's Distributed File System (I'm not sure whether this was part of SBS 2000 - before
-
Hi, I was discussing why multiple SBS 2003 servers couldn't be run on the same subnet on the sbs2k Yahoo Groups. I suggested that some clues lay in the Swing process which was developed by Jeff Middleton MVP. Okay, we all argued and some said you could and it was only a DHCP issue and we went around in some circles until Jeff's reply put the
-
Hi Paulie, Try the Microsoft Office Online site and also the Small Business+ service which is linked from the bcentral site. I hope that helps, Vijay
-
There's an overview of Vista's Diagnostic Tools on the O'ReillyNet website by Mitch Tulloch. Cheers, Vijay
-
Hi Paulie, Interesting that you use a 3rd party for the filtering. How aggressive is the filtering? Do you have issues with it ever wrongly classifying real mail as junk? I would think your customers would be quite happy as they don't have to worry about filtering through the spam themselves and/or checking Junk Email folders! Cheers, Vijay
-
I had a customer who recently asked me if I could do anything about the increase in spam they were experiencing. I advised them to use the Junk Email controls in Outlook 2003 as these work quite well in my experience (at least as a first option). However, I then came across this link which is a guide to Exchange Server Intelligent Message Filter v2
-
This is an issue that I see on one of the SBS 2003 servers that I manage on a regular basis. It has never stopped users from ultimately receiving email (the interval is set to 15 mins) because although an error might occur on one of the intervals, usually the mail will be delivered on the next pass. On a server that has SBS SP1 on it, this issue is
-
Hi Dave, I'm never happy working with customers who break licensing conditions which is why in my post I stated that I had advised them on increasing their CALs, which they don't have an issue with. My question was, are domain logons denied when CALs are all assigned and say another user/device tries to logon? I have read from other sources, i.e. Harry
-
Hi, I have been trying to understand how CAL enforcement works but haven't been able to find a definitive answer. The 5 CALs that come with SBS 2003 are described as Universal CALs, so they can be either user or device CALs. The Microsoft Liensing faq http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/evaluation/faq/licensing.mspx says that "At the top